On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> > Care to describe what you are doing/planning, is this the knfsd work in
> > progress?
>
> Sorry. Slightly more fundamental stuff and it interacts with knfsd
> patches. What happens right now is the switch to new architecture for
> mount-related stuff and lookups. It's almost VFS-only, with some
> exceptions; knfsd being one of them. knfsd stuff will go as soon as that
> crap will be past the critical phase - table of exports and first steps of
> fhandle to dentry conversion are seriously affected by mount stuff and as
> soon as that will be in we will be able to get fhandle_to_dentry() into
> the tree.
> ObReiserfs: what about readdir() vs. rebalancing and friends?
>
I think you are asking about our code that detects when the tree has been
balanced underneath us, and starts the search over, right?
3.6.4 is a bit cleaner than the code you read, but we haven't added the
tree locking yet. It is in the list, which we are still prioritizing ;-)
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:13 EST