On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 09:12:47AM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > Ouch. b-tree => potentially unbound amount of blocks to be written
> > during the operation.
>
> Yes, but if you are talking about storing extents rather than individual
> block mappings, then the amount of data in the tree will be a _tiny_
> fraction of the amount needed in the current scheme.
Yes. And what will it do to journalling/soft-updates/whatever equivalent
you prefer? At least with the normal scheme the amount of requests per
transaction is limited and we know the limit...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:13 EST