On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 ying@almaden.ibm.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if someone can give me some explanations on why putting
> lock_kernel() around fput() in
> binfmt_elf.c (and maybe somewhere else) in 2.3.99-pre5. It seems like
> whatever needs to be protected are already done within
> fput() function itself. I don't see why lock_kernel() is needed. Also, by
> making d_count atomic, it seems like one can get rid of
> lock kernel calls around all the dget()'s, if not anything else. Is this
> right?
The last part is wrong. The first (fput()) is OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:11 EST