Re: umount2

From: Richard B. Johnson (root@chaos.analogic.com)
Date: Sun Apr 16 2000 - 17:44:10 EST


On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Velizar Bodoursky wrote:

> I tried this procedure, the result was, the umount didn't succeed it produced
> three messages in row stating that /var, /usr and /home were busy, tried the
> `ps` this showed nothing but the processes which were supposed to be respawned
> by init, I guess there is something with the logic of deciding is a device
> busy or not, I use standart RedHat 6.0 haven't modified the scripts too much,
> and definitely haven't played with the part about unmounting, btw this problem
> was absent at 2.3.99-pre3, and currently i am with pre5. I am not following the
> mailing list so if there is something i should read please send it directly to
> me.
>
Okay. This shows that you have discovered a real bug in the new code.
With this info, I'm sure that there are some persons that are working
on it.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson

Penguin : Linux version 2.3.41 on an i686 machine (800.63 BogoMips).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:09 EST