Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Sat Apr 15 2000 - 14:54:24 EST


"G. Allen Morris III" wrote:
> >
> > Exactly. This is the kind of thing that makes devfs worth it. Together
> > with some way of specifying these things for the whole network (I wasn't
> > kidding when I mentioned NIS) it actually gives system administrators
> > something new. And it makes for more than just a regular /dev on a regular
> > filesystem.
>
> This sounds just like autofs to me! The only difference with /dev is
> that you would be creating block or character special files instead of
> soft links and nfs mounts.
>

FWIW, it would be a trivial hack to make autofs capable of generating
device nodes on demand. I have yet to see any strong use for that,
though; emphasis here on "on demand."

        -hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:26 EST