Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 12:00:15 EST

Next message: David Elliott: "Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"
Previous message: Dr. Kelsey Hudson: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> said:

[...]

> I'm hoping that devfs will evolve to something else.

Into what? Just curious...

-- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Elliott: "Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"
Previous message: Dr. Kelsey Hudson: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST