Re: What /proc should contain [was: /proc/driver/microcode]

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 18:42:52 EST


Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10002241303150.12259-100000@beaker>
By author: Ricky Beam <jfbeam@bluetopia.net>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> >I think that better resolution for availability of /proc information would
> >be a good thing.
>
> Several have been suggested, but Linus hasn't liked any of them.
>
> Personally, I'd like to see all of the sysconf() information vectored
> directly from the kernel. Make sysconf() a system call (if it isn't
> already) and then make every one of the POSIX/UNIX98 standard variables
> available from the kernel -- most of it should already be in the kernel
> somewhere.
>
> (_SC_NPROCESSORS_* (without parsing cpuinfo) would certainly shut me up :-))
>

NAK!

A lot of these are information about the C library.

Some, definitely, would make sense, but not all.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST