Re: devfs - why not ?

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 12:49:28 EST


Horst von Brand writes:
> Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org> said:
> > I could have sworn this was Richard's idea, not mine. devfsd, properly
> > implemented, can solve a *lot* of these problems. If the current
> > devfsd is a WIP, don't blame it on devfs design problems.
>
> devfsd, working on a on-disk device tree does solve the problems
> rather nicely IMHO. devfs is a horrible kludge, and seeing Linus
> include that in his tree makes me seriously doubt his taste this one
> time. And the devfsd idea is Linus's, AFAIKT.

Just one of the many things you've gotten wrong. I came up with
devfsd.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST