Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 06:07:16 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Previous message: bert hubert: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If you want to have a limited chroot environment, what's wrong with
> cp -a /dev/xxx /dev/yyy /dev/zzz ... /chroot/dev

cp -a isnt very bright about named pipes and things. Use tar but yes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
Previous message: bert hubert: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST