Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

From: Jan-Simon Pendry (JS.Pendry@msdw.com)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 14:11:05 EST


Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> Matthew Kirkwood writes:
> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Matt Aubury wrote:
> >
> > > create_proc_entries(NULL,
> > > "test:{bar:{x:%d,y:%d,z:%d},foo:%f}",
> > > &x, &y, &z, foo_fun);
> >
> > Thinking further about it, could the %'s become something
> > else? It'd be nice to be able to make these strings with
> > sprintf().
>
> No problem. Use "%%".
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard....

i think the suggestion is that %% is ugly, and more important, prone
to simply errors - the original doesn't need to use %. it could
use something else, like $, @, & etc.

jan-simon.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST