Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: George Bonser (grep@shorelink.com)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 00:45:30 EST

Next message: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how?"
Previous message: Graham Stoney: "Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation"
Next in thread: G. Allen Morris III: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Reply: G. Allen Morris III: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, G. Allen Morris III wrote:

> I would suggest that the dump file NOT be called `dump', maybe
> `.dump' would be a better choice.

why?

Just curious.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Krzysztof Halasa: "Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how?"
Previous message: Graham Stoney: "Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation"
Next in thread: G. Allen Morris III: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Reply: G. Allen Morris III: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST