Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: Mr. James W. Laferriere (babydr@baby-dragons.com)
Date: Mon Apr 10 2000 - 13:32:54 EST


        Hello Mark & All, Yuck ! There would be no structure or depth
        to an implementation like this . I have to agree with George
        Bonser that the bind-8 structure (taken from gated;-) would
        be closest to a human readable & still have structure & 'depth' .
                Twyl, JimL

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Olaf Titz wrote:
> Much as I hate to admit it, I have to work with MS stuff every day. They
> have this problem too, and a typical solution would be:
>
> [realms]
> stanford.edu = stanford_section
>
> [stanford_section]
> kdc1 = krb5auth1.stanford.edu
> kdcport1 = 88
> kdc2 = krb5auth2.stanford.edu
> kdcport2 = 88
> kdc3 = krb5auth3.stanford.edu
> kdcport3 = 88
> admin_server = krb5-admin.stanford.edu
> default_domain = stanford.edu
       +----------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
       | Network Engineer | 25416 22nd So | Give me Linux |
       | babydr@baby-dragons.com | DesMoines WA 98198 | only on AXP |
       +----------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST