Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: Ed Carp (erc@pobox.com)
Date: Mon Apr 10 2000 - 11:58:23 EST


Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu) writes:

>
>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Ed Carp wrote:
>
> > > So, we end up with all white space except newline ignored, but we
> > > do have the line continuation character, which some people probably
> > > find annoying. At least it doesn't have to be in column 72.
> >
> > The problem with this sort of mismash is that you spend more time writing a parser for the data than it's worth. But I guess people in this industry have forgotten KISS a long time ago. If I have to spend days writing a parser for ASCII data, my clients will hit the roof - and rightfully so.
>
> Erm... You know, column 150-odd is also not a good idea...

What kind of mail UA are you using to read email? Almost every mail UA that I know of automatically wraps lines of text for you.

> [reformatted]
> > The problem with this sort of mismash is that you spend more time writing a
> > parser for the data than it's worth. But I guess people in this industry
> > have forgotten KISS a long time ago. If I have to spend days writing a
> > parser for ASCII data, my clients will hit the roof - and rightfully so.
>
> Sure. _Why_ would writing a parser take more than 15 minutes it takes to
> use yacc(1) and lex(1) and possibly 30 more to transliterate the results
> into library-free variant? Or couple of hours to build the fscking tables
> by hands. Sigh... I have to repeat my "ASCII is tough" comment - looks
> like reading through the "Using flex and bison", let alone first chapters
> of Aho & Ullman is oh-too-complex task. Sheesh...

That's not the point. The point is, it's not the right thing to do.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST