Re: Question: Gateway address == 0

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Mon Apr 10 2000 - 06:22:20 EST


Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it *IS* the Bible for these kinds of stuff, and the good
> > reasoning is interoperability.
>
> :-)
> Have you ever tried to count how many times network communication standards
> are broken in Linux (or any other OS)?
>
> Certainly, casual breaks are prohibited, and if we spot any we fix it as a
> bug. However, well-considered breaks (including considering interoperability
> consequences) and, more important, fixes for RFC bugs have always been ok.
>

Right, but this isn't one of them. There are good reasons for this
restriction.

        -hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST