Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: Anthony Barbachan (barbacha@Hinako.AMBusiness.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2000 - 04:31:46 EST


----- Original Message -----
From: "George Bonser" <grep@shorelink.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2000 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

> > Amen to that. Look at the all the hoops which linuxconf has to jump
> > through to try to tame things.
>
> If everything used the same format as BIND-8, the world would be a better
> place for me. It nests well and it seems to completely ignore all
> whitespace.
>

    Well I personally do not mind the bind-8 config file format too much I
don't think it is as clearly understandable as using a Samba/ini type of
format. The nesting could actually cause problems for some less programming
inclined people. And a '=' is more commonly understood than ':' or no
deliminator at all. Same goes for a '\n' over a ';'.

    I agree however that any kind of standard format would be good.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST