Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: Bill Wendling (wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu)
Date: Sat Apr 08 2000 - 17:46:25 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race"
Previous message: Stephen Richard Ives: "Re: Possible problem with ACCEPT/CONNECT in"
In reply to: jmcmullan@linuxcare.com: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Next in thread: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Also sprach jmcmullan@linuxcare.com:
} Why not (assuming we have a string based sysctl_s()) assign
} the MIB numbers to strings? Ie, a MIB <-> sysctl_s() database like:
}
Quick question, what are MIB numbers?

Sorry for the spam...

-- || Bill Wendling wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race"
Previous message: Stephen Richard Ives: "Re: Possible problem with ACCEPT/CONNECT in"
In reply to: jmcmullan@linuxcare.com: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Next in thread: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST