Stephen C. Tweedie writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:11:49AM -0800, David Whysong wrote:
> >
> > Please, no. Last time I checked, swap partitions were significantly faster
> > than swap files. And if you have to grow the file things will get worse.
>
> They are much closer in performance these days. The swap file
> handling has been improved substantially.
So what's the overhead these days of swap files versus partitions?
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:29 EST