Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c

From: Dragan Stancevic (visitor@valinux.com)
Date: Fri Mar 31 2000 - 12:47:13 EST

Next message: Dan Kegel: "Re: [PATCH] for 2.2.14 to improve SpecWeb96 performance"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: block_dev.c not backward compatible with 2.2.15 APIs"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
Next in thread: David Hinds: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2000, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
; > So I am fine with whatever people prefer. Alan, Andrey should we use ethX in
; > all of the drivers?
;
; ethX is what most drivers use. It makes sense to me

OK, I'll change request_region to be dev->name, and allso I'll convert the
driver to start using the new pci device structure....

-Dragan

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dan Kegel: "Re: [PATCH] for 2.2.14 to improve SpecWeb96 performance"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: block_dev.c not backward compatible with 2.2.15 APIs"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
Next in thread: David Hinds: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:29 EST