Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c

• Next message: David Whysong: "Re: Avoiding OOM on overcommit...?"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Next in thread: Blu3Viper: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Reply: Blu3Viper: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > So I am fine with whatever people prefer. Alan, Andrey should we use ethX in
> > all of the drivers?
>
> ethX is what most drivers use. It makes sense to me

After I updated 3c575_cb resource stuff, a couple bug reports made their
way to lkml when I updated 3c575_cb, talking about how their hotplug
utilities were now reporting "3c575_cb" as the network interface instead
of "eth0"

It seems someone might be depending on that behavior..

-- 
Jeff Garzik              | Tact is the ability to tell a man 
Building 1024            | he has an open mind when he has a
MandrakeSoft, Inc.       | hole in his head.  (-random fortune)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David Whysong: "Re: Avoiding OOM on overcommit...?"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Next in thread: Blu3Viper: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Reply: Blu3Viper: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:29 EST