Re: Is ReiserFS really a journaling file system, or is it really just a synchronous-metadata file system like BSD FFS?

From: Olaf Dabrunz (1dabrunz@informatik.uni-hamburg.de)
Date: Wed Mar 29 2000 - 11:20:40 EST


On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 10:15:45AM +0200, Eilert Brinkmann wrote:
> Olaf Dabrunz <1dabrunz@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:11:14AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > >
> > > You need higher level transactions for that. Download to new name, fsync,
> > > rename().
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > What does it mean? Copy the file? rename()?
>
> Instead of overwriting the existing file, you write the new version
> into a new file with a different name, ensure that all data are
> written to disc and then use rename() to atomically replace the old
> file with the new one. This way you can be sure not to have a
> corrupted version of the file with it's normal name.

Oh, I see. I was thinking of database transactions here, but now I understand
the original problem. For databases the answer would be fsync(), as mentioned
earlier in this thread, or still a filesystem on its own.

Thanks,

Olaf.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST