Re: Is ReiserFS really a journaling file system, or is it really just a synchronous-metadata file system like BSD FFS?

From: Chris Mason (mason@suse.com)
Date: Wed Mar 29 2000 - 09:38:36 EST


On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> >What would be the proper kind of filesystem to run?

[ for protecting files from corrupt data ]

>
> reiserfs should be able to provide that feature too without having data
> journaling with some additional care in the way the data is exposed to
> userspace (mount option probably).
>
I think I see what you mean...perhaps we could do this by updating the
stat data to reflect which blocks have actually been written. If we read
a file that is incomplete, we have a choice of truncating off the bad
data, or simply refusing to service any operations for that file. Or did
you intend something else (my idea wouldn't be zero cost).

-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:24 EST