Re: __setup return value

From: Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Mar 27 2000 - 07:27:32 EST


On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:

> When is a driver supposed to return 0 from a __setup function? When
> it can't parse the options? Or when there's a possibility that the
> option is intended for another driver?

No-one seems to want to answer this, or else everyone missed it.

Is it worth me making a patch to change the behaviour of those drivers
that return 0 on error (rather that when the option could be used by
another driver) to return 1 instead?

Tim.
*/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST