Re: [PATCH] Re: kswapd

From: Kanoj Sarcar (kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com)
Date: Sun Mar 26 2000 - 20:21:11 EST


>
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Russell King wrote:
>
> > I think I've solved (very dirtily) my kswapd problem
>
> Your patch is the correct one. I've added an extra reschedule
> point and cleaned up the code a little bit. I wonder who sent
> the brown-paper-bag patch with the superfluous while loop to
> Linus ... (please raise your hand and/or buy rmk a beer)

That would be me ...

What is the problem that your patch is fixing? Other than the
while loop cosmetic changes, the only thing I see is to do
with rescheduling (ie, do not invoke do_try_to_free_pages or
run_task_queue() if need_resched is set). Note that before this
patch went in, as in 2.3.43 for example, the loop used to be:

                do {
                        /* kswapd is critical to provide GFP_ATOMIC
                           allocations (not GFP_HIGHMEM ones). */
                        if (nr_free_pages() - nr_free_highpages() >= freepages.high)
                                break;
                        if (!do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, 0))
                                break;
                        run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
                } while (!tsk->need_resched);
                tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
                interruptible_sleep_on(&kswapd_wait);
        }

Which is the behavior I _tried_ to preserve. Oh, btw, I am not convinced
that you should do a run_task_queue after _all_ pgdats have been scanned,
rather than after each one.

Kanoj

>
> Linus, could you please apply this patch ASAP? :)
>
> regards,
>
> Rik (PS. I'm still planning to implement the VM changes I posted
> to linux-mm earlier today, kswapd could be better and more efficient)
> --
> The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
> of people. That is its real strength.
>
> Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
> http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
>
>
>
> --- linux-2.3.99-pre3/mm/vmscan.c.orig Sat Mar 25 12:57:20 2000
> +++ linux-2.3.99-pre3/mm/vmscan.c Sun Mar 26 21:37:19 2000
> @@ -499,19 +499,19 @@
> * the processes needing more memory will wake us
> * up on a more timely basis.
> */
> - do {
> - pgdat = pgdat_list;
> - while (pgdat) {
> - for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
> - zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> - if ((!zone->size) || (!zone->zone_wake_kswapd))
> - continue;
> - do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, zone);
> - }
> - pgdat = pgdat->node_next;
> + pgdat = pgdat_list;
> + while (pgdat) {
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
> + zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> + if (tsk->need_resched)
> + schedule();
> + if ((!zone->size) || (!zone->zone_wake_kswapd))
> + continue;
> + do_try_to_free_pages(GFP_KSWAPD, zone);
> }
> - run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
> - } while (!tsk->need_resched);
> + pgdat = pgdat->node_next;
> + }
> + run_task_queue(&tq_disk);
> tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> interruptible_sleep_on(&kswapd_wait);
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:18 EST