Rick van Rein writes:
> Hello!
>
> My computer currently runs smoothly with two DIMMs that were considered dead,
> just because they suffered from static discharge. A RAM checker told me what
> sections of the RAMs were indeed dead, and all the rest could be exploited.
>
> I can use 61 MB out of 64 MB, which is a great result, and good for
> trees. My main concern regarding trees is not reuse of RAM that
> suffered from static electricity, but to be able to use RAM in spite
> of manufacturing errors; a very large portion of RAMs (95% of the
> production?) must now be discarded of due to such errors. Trees
> don't like that. Neither do I.
What does wasted RAM have to do with trees?!? Beaches, yes. But
trees?!?
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:13 EST