Re: io_request_lock and system performance (can it be replaced?)

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 16:29:41 EST


Riley Williams writes:
> Hi Alan.
>
> > In part the lock should only be held very briefly so it
> > shouldnt be that contented.
>
> I'm not sure whether the locks should be contented or not, but I
> would suspect the maintainers and developers would brefer to be
                                                     ^
> contented...
>
> I would presume you meant "contenDed" though...

Yes, I would Prefer that we all made no spelling mistakes.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:39 EST