On 22 Mar 2000 12:33:49 +0100, Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 22:02:33 -0600, you wrote:
>> Yes, we KNOW you want user resource quotas. You can't have them yet,
>> so stop talking about them - they are irrelevant here.
>
>Why "you can't have them yet"? Does that mean it IS planed to put resource
>quotas in? This is the first I've ever heard that it was planned.
It just means the kernel lacks the infrastructure that would enable creating
of per-user resource quotas at this time. But, most people did agree (even
those who are anti-noovercommit) that user resource quotas are good idea.
>And I don't think they are irrelevant. If this is not the location to
>discuss kernel features, what is?
Opening some other thread in LKML, perhaps ?
-- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:37 EST