Re: questions about patches and drivers

From: TimO (hairballmt@mcn.net)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 12:49:54 EST


"Pre" patches are not additive, the previously applied patch must be
reversed prior to applying the next. ie pre3-6.gz should be applied to the
base pre3 tree and NOT applied to the pre3-5 tree.

Rikard Westlund wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> 1.I have installed the patch-2.3.99-pre1/2 and the pre3-3 (trying to get my
> tulip quadport card to work). Now there is some new patches, like
> pre3-4/5/6. I tried to add these but there were some files that got
> rejected. Should these files not be added like "normal" patches, in
> numerical order??
>
> 2.All these pre3-X patches, will they form a patch-2.3.99-pre3 patch?
>
> 3.Anyone out there thats got a working (tulip.c)quadport card on the
> 2.3.51(or later) kernel?
>
> 4.I know that Jeff Garzik is working on the tulip drivers, is there
> anyone working/responsible on/for the eepro100.c driver?
>
> TIA
>
> Rikard Westlund
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>

-- 
===============
-- Tim
--------------------==============++==============--------------------

-- Hebrews 10:10-14 (KJV)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:36 EST