Re: Overcommitable memory??

From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen (rask-linux@kampsax.k-net.dk)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 07:40:28 EST


Den 20-Mar-00 18:44:28 skrev Horst von Brand fĝlgende om "Re: Overcommitable memory?? ":
> Jesse Pollard <pollard@cats-chateau.net> said:

> [...]

>> YOU ARN'T OOM - a specific user is out of resources, not a catastrophic
>> failure.

> If the user's programs get killed, they'll be pissed off.

   And for a good reason too. So don't kill the user's programs. That's why
Jesse and others would really like per user memory quotas, just as you have
per user disk space quotas. If you can disable overcommit, the program is
in control of what happens when it can't get the amount of memory it would
like. If you also add per user memory quotas, the system administrator can
prevent a single user (or another finite number of users) from using all
memory.

Regards,

/ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻTŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: mailto:rask@kampsax.dtu.dk |
| Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
| mailing list. I am on the list.| "ThrustMe" on XPilot, ARCnet and IRC |
| Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard drive? |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:32 EST