Re: Light-On pnic hang?

From: Roger Gammans (rgammans@computer-surgery.co.uk)
Date: Sun Mar 19 2000 - 11:52:56 EST

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Overcommitable memory??"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: On the issue of low memory situations"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Light-On pnic hang?"
Next in thread: Per Lundberg: "Re: Light-On pnic hang?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:16:23AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Roger Gammans wrote:
> > kernel version etc you have), with the (new) tulip.o driver which
> > went away with the old-tulip.o driver. Can I suggest yo
> > try the old_tulip driver if your not already.
>
> I am fighting this in 2.3.x, I want LESS tulip drivers in the kernel,
> not more :)

Sensible, but the driver needs to actually work.

OTOH if you need help testing, etc. Let me know I've got a machine
I could (read 'ought to') move over to 2.3.

TTFN

-- Roger

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Overcommitable memory??"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: On the issue of low memory situations"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Light-On pnic hang?"
Next in thread: Per Lundberg: "Re: Light-On pnic hang?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST