Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken

From: David Ford (david@kalifornia.com)
Date: Fri Mar 17 2000 - 06:08:18 EST


Jeff Garzik wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Donald Becker wrote:
> > I'm in the increasingly untenable position of being expected to maintain
> > drivers for the current and older kernels, but not having any influence over
> > the new development exactly because of that backwards compatibility.
>
> Then participate in discussions on linux-kernel! That's how open source works.

Open source also means dispersion. We don't have megopoly center here. There's a
huge amount of development that goes on OFF the linux-kernel list for numerous
reasons.

-d

--
    \\\\\|||||| &%&%&%&    99 little bugs in the code, 99 bugs in the code,
   @|~|' |o> @|&     fix one bug, compile it again...
     | \\__/ | /,    |&     101 little bugs in the code....
      \    /    -'  ,
      E-- |--HUGS---

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:22 EST