Re: 2.4.x jobs (updated)

From: Martin Mares (mj@suse.cz)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 07:02:57 EST


Hello!

> pci_set_master should have a per-architecture implementation to
> do deal with issues, such as this one.
>
> For example, I may know that if I set the latency timer on a PCI
> devices higher than X there is a bug which can be triggered to
> lockup the PCI host bridge, and crap like this.
>
> It really should not be generic.
>
> Martin, want to cook up a patch for this?

   Yes, of course, but first of all I'd like to know what exactly the
problems are. I dislike creating yet another architecture specific function
-- I'd prefer to keep the function generic, but allow the architecture
to set the right constants (either by macros in pci.h [which can be defined
to call functions if needed, of course] or by adding a new entry in struct
pci_dev).

                                Have a nice fortnight

-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> <mj@suse.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
"My computer isn't that nervous, it's just a bit ANSI."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST