Re: (reiserfs) Re: reiserfs and knfsd and NFSv4 and volatile file handles

From: Lutz Vieweg (lkv@isg.de)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 07:15:00 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: NIC and Timing"
Previous message: Jim Morris: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
In reply to: Olaf Kirch: "Re: (reiserfs) reiserfs and knfsd and NFSv4 and volatile file handles"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Olaf Kirch wrote:

> 6. It may not hurt much if reiserfs is aiming just at NFSv3
> and ignores NFSv2 completely. Exporting a modern file
> system over 1980s technology is quite a bad match.

Well spoken!

We do use reiserfs on several productive server systems, and I'd
say once you are convinced by its advantages, you wouldn't like
to see it crippled just to support some ancient technology.

There is a price to pay for progress, and in this case it is
very well worth it.

Regards,

Lutz Vieweg

--
 Dipl. Phys. Lutz Vieweg  | email: lkv@isg.de
 Innovative Software GmbH | Phone/Fax: +49-69-505030 -20/-50
 Feuerbachstrasse 26-32   | http://www.isg.de/persons/lkv/
 60325 Frankfurt am Main  | ^^^ PGP key available here ^^^

application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: NIC and Timing"
Previous message: Jim Morris: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
In reply to: Olaf Kirch: "Re: (reiserfs) reiserfs and knfsd and NFSv4 and volatile file handles"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST