Re: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix

From: Riley Williams (rhw@MemAlpha.cx)
Date: Sun Mar 12 2000 - 09:50:36 EST


Hi Albert.

>>> It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are
>>> doing something strange. And it should not be much
>>> bigger than it is now -- there should not be much
>>> "active but currently not used" interrupts.

>> 64 on my box.

> 64 k on an S/390, from the 16-bit channel ID.

> (not saying I wouldn't like this change on my PC though)

One thing that would help with configuration problems is a file
that listed totals from last boot for all interrupts that have
actually occurred. I would put that in a separate file though.

Best wishes from Riley.

 * Copyright (C) 2000, Memory Alpha Systems.
 * All rights and wrongs reserved.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 * http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST