Re: 2.3.51 How come...

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Sat Mar 11 2000 - 16:52:35 EST


On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Just upgraded to 2.3.51 earlier today. In the course of plugging
> in a suggestion from Linus concerning shmget errors (mounting shm file
> system DID fix that problem) I noticed a rather strange anomoly. File
> systems which use to NOT show up with "df" now do show up with wierd numbers.

        Weird number being (unsigned long)(-1). statfs(2) says that all
undefined fields must be filled with that. Apparently df(1) disagrees...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST