Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series..

From: Blu3Viper (david@killerlabs.com)
Date: Sat Mar 11 2000 - 16:20:14 EST

Next message: John Cavan: "Re: Should this be in mem.c?"
Previous message: Blu3Viper: "Re: [2.3.51] PCMCIA questions"
In reply to: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series.."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series.."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

And slowly but methodically we tie up loose ends :)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
[a few he didn't but he did and it doesn't but it does snipped]

=)

-d

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: John Cavan: "Re: Should this be in mem.c?"
Previous message: Blu3Viper: "Re: [2.3.51] PCMCIA questions"
In reply to: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series.."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series.."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST