Re: eepro100.c, Why the version downgrade?

From: Dragan Stancevic (visitor@valinux.com)
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 18:44:39 EST

Next message: Mike Coleman: "Re: Allow debuger to examine real parent"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Allow debuger to examine real parent"
In reply to: Dragan Stancevic: "eepro100.c, Why the version downgrade?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
; > Why is the 15pre11 patch for eepro100.c downgrading the version number
; > back to 1.06 what happened to 1.09j-t?
; Pardon ?

I must have had sand in my eyes, sorry about the confusion.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Coleman: "Re: Allow debuger to examine real parent"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Allow debuger to examine real parent"
In reply to: Dragan Stancevic: "eepro100.c, Why the version downgrade?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST