Re: bug: mount on an open directory succeeds

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 03:59:31 EST

Next message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Linux ports (was: Linux 64 bit - Trillium)"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Does your change make find faster by changing where it is storedor where it is returned?"
In reply to: Amit S. Kale: "bug: mount on an open directory succeeds"
Next in thread: Amit S. Kale: "Re: bug: mount on an open directory succeeds"
Reply: Amit S. Kale: "Re: bug: mount on an open directory succeeds"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Amit S. Kale wrote:

> Hi,
> mount on an open directory succeeds.

Yes, it does. WTF makes you think that it's a bug?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Linux ports (was: Linux 64 bit - Trillium)"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Does your change make find faster by changing where it is storedor where it is returned?"
In reply to: Amit S. Kale: "bug: mount on an open directory succeeds"
Next in thread: Amit S. Kale: "Re: bug: mount on an open directory succeeds"
Reply: Amit S. Kale: "Re: bug: mount on an open directory succeeds"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:19 EST