Re: cow-links

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 18:19:28 EST


Nix wrote:
> > there are special cases where you don't have to hash to know
> > that units can be coalesced. Copying (ln --cow-link or something) is one
> > example.
>
> If it has to be done manually, IMNSHO it is nearly useless. The whole
> point of this is that redundancy that you *didn't know was redundant*
> can be eliminated. (If you want redundancy for safety, FS replication
> and/or RAID are the way to go; not accident.)

ln --cow-link would be extremely useful actually. For us developers
especially.

> Yeah, basically. Only the compression algorithm is designed on-the-fly
> for that data set.
>
> (The maths nutter --- not I --- whose idea most of this was is still
> working on it.)

Sounds like you're working on something similar to me. Better keep it
mysterious :-)

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST