Re: Linux kernerl preemptive ??

From: Alexey Zhuravlev (alexey@istu.udm.ru)
Date: Sat Mar 04 2000 - 13:59:04 EST


Tuukka Toivonen wrote:

> Now, one would suppose that fine-granularity locking is the goal. Many
> commercial operating systems do that, eg. IRIX. It is supposed to give the
> best scalability. However, this has a hit on performance especially on
> systems with just one or two CPUs (like most PCs these days).
>
> Some people (mainly Larry McVoy) have proposed that this shouldn't be
> done. He has proposed another way how scalability should be achieved. But
> since you didn't ask that, I stop my story here.

very interesting. Can you continue from this point?

:.˛mkabzwmb˛mbz_^nrzh&zvy杶ii



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST