Re: [OT] Microsoft invents symbolic links

From: Davide Libenzi (davidel@maticad.it)
Date: Thu Mar 02 2000 - 12:52:54 EST


> Anyone want to impart clue? I'm under the impression that symlinks
> and shortcuts are the same thing; hardlinks and shortcuts are
> different.

If foo.lnk is a Win32 shortcut to foo.dat and You execute :

FILE * pFile = fopen("foo.lnk", "r");

You get the raw foo.lnk file.
In Unix if foo.lnk is a symlink to foo.dat You get foo.dat file descriptor,
that is the correct behaviour.

Davide.

--
Feel free, feel Debian !

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:12 EST