James Manning wrote:
>
> part of 2.3.49-pre2 moved the "source drivers/parport/Config.in" call
> such that parallel port support went under the main menu in menuconfig
> instead of in general setup... if this was intentional (I can't see why,
> though) and I missed the discussion, my apologies.
It kept into my patch by accident.. Can we keep it that way, though?
It seems to me that the parport drivers might in the future depend on
CONFIG_PM either directly or indirectly, and that CONFIG_PM should
always be fairly high up in arch/xxx/config.in.
Jeff
>
> James
>
> --- linux/arch/i386/config.in.orig Wed Mar 1 03:18:43 2000
> +++ linux/arch/i386/config.in Wed Mar 1 03:18:27 2000
> @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@
> tristate 'Kernel support for ELF binaries' CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF
> tristate 'Kernel support for MISC binaries' CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC
>
> +source drivers/parport/Config.in
> +
> bool 'Power Management support' CONFIG_PM
>
> dep_bool ' ACPI support' CONFIG_ACPI $CONFIG_PM
> @@ -162,8 +164,6 @@
> fi
>
> endmenu
> -
> -source drivers/parport/Config.in
>
> source drivers/pnp/Config.in
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Jeff Garzik | Rule 1: Building 1024 | There is no cabal. MandrakeSoft, Inc. |- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:09 EST