Hi Dave
> On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > Basically I think these changes are fine. My only comment (which is
> > admittedly nit-picking) is that the "==="s under the title maybe should be
> > extended to match the new title's length. :)
> That nit is picked, and a new patch is attached.
:-)
> ...
> > first attempt at ALS007 detection code broke his ALS-100. As a result of a
> > number of (register-level) tests Mikael ran for me, I came up with the
> > current code which is able to distinguish between the ALS007 and ALS100.
> > The mention of the ALS100 at line 773 is only due to this.
> Would you like any tests run on my ALS200?
Could do - if I can identify any unique register behaviour which
differentiates the ALS100 from the ALS200 then we can get the kernel to
properly identify the ALS200 as well. You'll have to give me a few days to
dig up the code though :) - maybe by next week. One question: what does the
current code identify your card as - an ALS100 or just SB16?
Regards
jonathan
-- * Jonathan Woithe jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au * * http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~jwoithe/home.html * ***-----------------------------------------------------------------------*** ** "Time is an illusion; lunchtime doubly so" ** * "...you wouldn't recognize a subtle plan if it painted itself purple * * and danced naked on a harpsicord singing 'subtle plans are here again'" *- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:23 EST