On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 nathan.zook@amd.com wrote:
>
> You specifically mentioned es:di being changed as a don't care. The problem
> is that the ACPI spec (Table 14.2) describes es:di out as, "Return Address
> Range Descriptor pointer. Same value as on input."
Feel free to do sanity checking.
But no config options.
Why?
I'm looking at the current patch, and I'm left wondering which magic
combination of options I would choose as a vendor.
If one set of config options is not generally usable, then that set should
not exist at all. I refuse to have code that is complex _and_ conditional,
and for no apparent reason.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:20 EST