-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I disagree. Scanning a whole class C is fine. Just don't do it more than
once or twice. And if that doesn't work, the scope may have to be
expanded to /22 or even /20.
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> There are those misguided souls who build huge "dumb" bridged networks ...
> IMHO, unsolicited brute-force scanning anything beyond a few dozen
> addresses is unacceptable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOLm8eMK9HT/YfGeBAQGc+wP/XwkLUkDF5SMqMJoIjFQCba/lEKeNpk2h
hdSxdmG1QW6l7UfQjDlyjGCWKNPEuHRCSbjCgE/oZzQThfGn4+LZ1HdmTMvbqpFA
l4A4Qb6OasfTMTD5JTilUQEeEVfi2R2nkL1uEPku7VStMJYjCLDyXO0mi9gZOCb2
KNoFiNbrLhs=
=/mdz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:19 EST