Re: [linux-fbdev] [PATCH] matrxofb i2c fix

From: Petr Vandrovec (vandrove@vc.cvut.cz)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2000 - 18:47:50 EST


> > bool ' Mystique support' CONFIG_FB_MATROX_MYSTIQUE
> > bool ' G100/G200/G400 support' CONFIG_FB_MATROX_G100
> > - dep_tristate ' Matrox I2C support' CONFIG_FB_MATROX_I2C $CONFIG_FB_MATROX $CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT
> > - if [ "$CONFIG_FB_MATROX_G100" = "y" ]; then
> > - dep_tristate ' G400 second head support' CONFIG_FB_MATROX_MAVEN $CONFIG_FB_MATROX_I2C
> > - fi
> > + if [ "$CONFIG_I2C" != "n" ]; then
> > + dep_tristate ' Matrox I2C support' CONFIG_FB_MATROX_I2C $CONFIG_FB_MATROX $CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT
> > + if [ "$CONFIG_FB_MATROX_G100" = "y" ]; then
> > + dep_tristate ' G400 second head support' CONFIG_FB_MATROX_MAVEN $CONFIG_FB_MATROX_I2C
> > + fi
> > + fi
Well, I probably fail to see something, but I was under impression
that if last keyword on dep_tristate line is CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT,
then this already limits CONFIG_FB_MATROX_I2C to be available with
CONFIG_I2C. Or did someone change dep_tristate semantic?
                        Thanks,
                                        Petr Vandrovec
                                        vandrove@vc.cvut.cz

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:18 EST