On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Larry McVoy wrote:
>Anyway, I'm tired so this explanation probably sucks, but the bottom
>line is that if you optimize your scheduler for lat_ctx on an SMP,
>you probably made it slower for real workloads. If Linux has a way to
That was my whole point. I agree completly. I am ok to do something that
may optimize lat_ctx on SMP if it doesn't harm normal workloads though ;).
>If this has done nothing but confuse you, send mail, I'll try again.
No, I agree and it matches with my RL experience. Thanks for the
clarification.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:18 EST