Re: bottom half's bug introduced in 2.3.43

From: Rui Sousa (rsousa@grad.physics.sunysb.edu)
Date: Sat Feb 26 2000 - 18:43:00 EST


Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > * your statement about compatibility makes no sense. There is NO binary
> > module compatibility, because critical kernel structures change with
> > compiler and kernel options.
>
> Whats going on is that the emu10k makefiles don't set CPU= and thus generate
> incorrect binaries for the kernel. Its not stunningly obvious that you need
> to set this I grant but you do.
>
> Because they are the module they inherit valid kernel version info for their
> miscompiled object so that it loads and explodes
>
> Alan

So the only absolutely safe way of compiling a module outside the kernel three
is to have the .config available plus all the arch/*/Makefiles?

Rui Sousa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:16 EST