Re: Capabilities

From: jmcmullan@linuxcare.com
Date: Sat Feb 26 2000 - 01:22:45 EST


Casey Schaufler <casey@sgi.com> wrote:
> The SystemV/MLS product from AT&T Federal (circa 1986) co-opted
> the group bits as the index into a table which included a variety
> of security attributes. Their experiance influenced the POSIX work.
> No one else ever did such a thing as a result of their experiance.

        Ie, it was a ``learning experience''? ;^)

> The 1003.1e/2c group came into the effort without a clue of what
> to do. If the document resembles a camel, well that's why. No one
> had an implementation at the begining. We designed our own and each
> others systems together.

        Is there any plan to build a standard based upon current
known-to-work-in-real-life system?

>> > as the work of $DIETY.

> As flattering as the description might be, We recognize Our falability.
> Especially when it comes to spelling.

        Nope. No spelling error there. You see:

$ DIETY="Richard Simmons"
$ export DIETY

        ;^)

-- 
Jason McMullan, Senior Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc.
412.422.8077 tel, 415.701.0792 fax
jmcmullan@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:14 EST