Hi!
> > (Program that can modify files for DNS and which is allowed to bind
> > low port is doable with elfcap, but not with this proposal, because
> > there are no additional bits to store "new uid" as I do in elfcap.
>
> Why can't it be done in this proposal? Binding to a low port is a
My proposal was to drop forced set and keep only allowed in
filesystem. That just is not good enough. Consider proposal dead.
Pavel
-- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents me at discuss@linmodems.org- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST