Re: Capabilities

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl)
Date: Mon Feb 21 2000 - 16:37:14 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Previous message: Dean Gaudet: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Capabilities"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: Capabilities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andreas Gruenbacher <a.gruenbacher@bestbits.at> said:

[...]

> Well, maybe it is better than requiring ext2cap, reiserfscap, vfatcap,
> isocap, udfcap and nfscap :-).

You'll want capabilities in your attached filessystems, at most. So yes, it
will have to be in ext3fs and reiserfs. But not in ISO, VFAT or even NFS or
CODA.

-- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Previous message: Dean Gaudet: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Capabilities"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: Capabilities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:28 EST